<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>EricaJoy - Latest Comments in Comcast High Speed Internet: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</title><link>http://ericajoy.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ericajoy.disqus.com/comcast_high_speed_internet_the_good_the_bad_and_the_ugly/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:08:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Comcast High Speed Internet: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</title><link>http://www.ericabaker.com/2009/09/20/comcast-good-bad-ugl/#comment-17169018</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ouchie! Time for the office to upgrade.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EricaJoy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast High Speed Internet: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</title><link>http://www.ericabaker.com/2009/09/20/comcast-good-bad-ugl/#comment-17127150</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, at the office? 4.582 download and 5.589 upload. Yay.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast High Speed Internet: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</title><link>http://www.ericabaker.com/2009/09/20/comcast-good-bad-ugl/#comment-17106534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You win! I only got 15.261 download and 3.71 upload. Dang.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:38:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast High Speed Internet: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</title><link>http://www.ericabaker.com/2009/09/20/comcast-good-bad-ugl/#comment-17049272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow the speed is awesome, thanks for the post, it was really informative.  I need to get a better cable modem for sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayMoney</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:32:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast High Speed Internet: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</title><link>http://www.ericabaker.com/2009/09/20/comcast-good-bad-ugl/#comment-17028220</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure Louis. :) I did the test here: &lt;a href="http://sanjose.speedtest.comcast.net/speedtest/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sanjose.speedtest.comcast.net/speedtest/"&gt;http://sanjose.speedtest.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EricaJoy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:17:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast High Speed Internet: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</title><link>http://www.ericabaker.com/2009/09/20/comcast-good-bad-ugl/#comment-17028014</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you provide the link where you did this test? As always, it'd be great to benchmark and see where I fit versus your results.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:01:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>